Through 10th September to the 5th October, The Charity Bank is running a Follow The Money campaign [#FollowTheMoney]. Tresoc were delighted to be invited to be a part of this, meeting up with the Charity Bank on the first day of their campaign on a visit to Totnes.
As you may already be aware, The Charity Bank provided a loan to Tresoc during a crucial stage of the society’s development, allowing the solar installation at Hatchlands Farm to get underway and for our solar portfolio to expand. Charity Bank are profiling us in a national campaign to show how Tresoc have developed into a thriving local renewable energy society, with all the benefits this brings to our community.
Read more about how this timely intervention helped Tresoc, with words from our Executive Director, Ian Bright, on the Follow The Money Campaign website.
Thank you to local Tresoc members who were able to turn up and be a part of this occasion.
The 3rd Annual Archimedes Screw Fest
Event date: 6th October 2018
Join us to celebrate the River Dart and its most spectacular new landmark – the twin turbines of the Totnes Weir hydropower scheme.
We’ll be celebrating the many ways we all care for the River Dart – we support clean energy, make art, write poetry, stop plastic getting in to it, learn about biodiversity, become citizen scientists, notice problems, track and log wildlife, swim, boat and fish considerately…
Rain or shine there’ll be loads of fun activities going on all day …
- Turbine Tours at 12 noon and 3pm
- Eureka! Meet Archimedes in person
- Citizen Science and rivers bugs with Westcountry Rivers Trust
- Renewable energy technology workshops for primary children with REEL
- Join in with the “Plastic Free Salmon” art project
- Find out about Bio-Regional Learning Centre’s pilot Dart Charter on the Dartington Estate
- Learn about more community energy investment opportunities from TRESOC
- Yummy arancini (Archimedes favourite snack) from The Kitchen Table
The Screw Fest is Tour Stop #4 on Transition Town Totnes’ Eco Homes Weekend trail.
How to get there
The site is accessible via foot- and cycle-path from Totnes to Dartington – it’s about half a mile upstream of Totnes town centre. It’s a lovely easy walk on flat ground. No parking nearby.
Hope to see you …
The TRESOC Team.
A collection of oral histories was gathered over the summer of 2017 by Tresoc intern, Lawrie Swinnen-Styles. Here are two personal accounts from two local families: the Amhersts who currently live in the old mill house and where the proposed new archimedes turbines will be located; plus local businessman Richard O’Connell, whose family have lived in the area for a few generations, right back to when the original leat and turbine were constructed by the Elmhirsts. It’s a fascinating snapshot into the past, that we are delighted and priviledged to record.
The Amherst Family.
What do you know about the original building of the turbines in 1929?
Well, it was quite a complex process, because they had to add a length to the millhouse in order to house the turbines. We’ve converted the turbine house into a sort of hall, and you can still see bits of I-beam jutting out of the walls where they used to have hoists. From the outside of the building, you can also see some original archway stones which have now been blocked up.
When the Elmhirsts renovated Dartington Hall, they rented Staverton Bridge Mill to house their workforce, and similarly hired this building to house the turbines, and the hydro project was built not very long after the Elmhirsts started on the Hall.
I never heard why it was they closed the turbines down, but I can only assume it was too expensive to recondition it. I don’t think they even explored renewing it when it was due for closure. The Elmhirsts had leased rather than bought the Staverton Bridge Mill and this building from the Church commissioners, and all they had to do was wind up the leases, and the Church commissioners sold them. The Dartington Trustees weren’t involved in the sale at all.
So when did the turbine stop?
Around 1970. There’s a plaque outside the wheelhouse that gives the dates, 1929-1970
And when did you move into the house?
- I’d worked at Dartington- we were on the estate there for 13 years before we came here. All the time we’d lived there, we never actually found this place. I think we might have known of it, but we didn’t have occasion to come to Staverton often.
Do you know who lived here beforehand?
This was the miller’s house- quite a modest house, and the chap who lived here at the time was an employee of Dartington. He used to work for the estate stores, and drive the estate lorry, and he had a wife and children, and he kept an eye on the hydro. Norman Caunter. We used to meet him at the Dartington Estate Christmas dinner. Very nice man, clearly very sad to move out.
Was the turbine still installed when you moved in, even though it wasn’t running?
Not when we actually got here. They’d been here a week or two before the house auction and taken all the stuff out. But there was still a lot of evidence of it. The hall from where the turbine was originally operated was covered in manhole covers. The turbines were lowered through the floor of that room, and we now have a clear cover where one of the manhole covers used to be, so you can see down into the leat.
What was the condition of the leat when you moved in?
There was nothing growing in it, and there was a modest flow coming through, which was very attractive. It was like two little streams; no weeds or anything. We had our four children living with us then, and they loved it. We had a little plastic boat, and they could row that up the leat to the sluice gates. We had boards made by a local sawmill, and put them in the slots under the house in order to raise the depth to about four feet.
Do you know who has had control of the sluice gate over the time that you’ve been living here?
Well when we first came, there was a thing called the River Authority, and there were two gentlemen who were responsible for the maintenance- keeping an eye on the whole of the River Dart, source to sea. They visited us after we’d been here a week or two, and they were very experienced men. One of them was very keen on fishing, and he seemed quite keen to set up something to develop the salmon population, though nothing really came of that. They used to come every couple of months I suppose, and we had inherited the handle that worked the sluice gates. So they came and borrowed that and would give the leat a flush every now and again; open the gates wide for two or three hours, and then they’d come back and shut them again. They were two really lovely chaps.
And then the River Authority was closed down, and their responsibility was passed to the Environment Agency, and from that moment, we didn’t really see anybody. When one of the uprights at the sluice was broken off – about a foot of it- the length of pipe that had broken off sat on the grass for many months, perhaps a couple of years. The Environment Agency would occasionally send someone to cast a brief eye over things, but they didn’t really take any interest or do anything at all.
So that went on for about 15 years. Then, around 1990, the Environment Agency appointed a new head of rivers and water. After he’d been appointed a year or so, he came and said “there’s so much water coming down here, it’s affecting the fishing, and I’m going to cut it down,” and he spent many hundreds of pounds building apparatus to control the flow and stop our use of the handle. Within a few days of cutting the- already tiny- flow of water in the leat, there were weeds beginning to grow throughout the entire length of the leat. Within weeks it was full of weeds, and within months it was like it is now, feet high. And the amount of water that they saved must have been negligible.
What about flooding in the leat?
Well we have had floods several feet high, up to the railway line. Not often, but enough to worry about. There was one occasion when there was a flood brewing, and the water level in the leat was so low- negligible- that when the flood built up, it came out over the river bank, and a wave 2 feet high came pouring across the garden and took down an 8 foot length of leat wall, which was the original mill wall from a couple of hundred years ago. I saw it happen. It was 11am, and I went out because I thought there was likely to be a flood, and this huge wave just crashed over the garden and poured into the empty leat. If the leat had had reasonable flow in it, not only might the flood have been relieved somewhat, but the overpouring of the water wouldn’t have destroyed the wall.
How frequently does flooding happen?
Well it depends on your definition I suppose, but for flooding bad enough to rise over the river banks and flow onto our tarmac, I would say between one and three times a year.
It’s been in the house three or four times since we’ve lived here. The worst occasion flooded the house 18 inches deep.
During one of the floods, two local young men came down the river in a canoe. What’s the story behind that?
That was during the worst flood, in the 70’s, and our youngest daughter was then about 12. Ann’s mother and brother managed to get to the main house from the small apartment where her mother lived, but our daughter made it out of the small top window of the apartment, and onto a passing canoe, rowed by two local young men. There was probably a less exciting way to get her out of the apartment, but then again the overflowing river was moving at quite a considerable speed.
There was a farmer’s horse living in our field at the time of the flood, and we thought the horse would have panicked and drowned, because nobody managed to rescue it. But the next morning, there was the horse, walking safely on the railway line. It must have made its way up to safety during the night.
Just outside our house, there’s a 10 foot farm gate to the field, and that came off its hinges during the flood, and was found in Littlehempston, three or four miles down the railway, when the flood subsided.
Did you ever have any warning of floods beforehand?
There used to be a flood warning by telephone, though we weren’t warned very far in advance. I think the Environment Agency has improved its flood warnings since then.
When did you build the wall at the bottom of the leat?
Around 20 years ago. My idea was the if we had a wall across there around 7 foot high with a small escape for the water, the water level would rise to almost the level of the adjoining land, and in the summer it would make a wonderful swimming pool. But it didn’t work because the head of water at the Environment Agency at the time insisted on some questionable things. For instance, having a fish ladder up to that wall so that any odd fish that wanted to come up the leat could get over it. The fact that they would then get stuck in the sluice was something that she did not seem to consider. At one time the water was just deep enough to swim up the leat, but eventually our plans for a pool were thwarted.
That wall is only made out of sandbags really, so it will be very little work to knock down.
And finally, how do you feel about the plans of Tresoc to renew the leat and rebuild a turbine?
I’m delighted. It was a very long time ago that the original turbine was built, and it’s good to think the whole idea will be brought back. We’re very happy to feel the leat is actually going to be used again. I have every faith that if Tresoc and Fishtek say it’s possible and financially viable, it will get built.
My father was John O’Connell, born on the 24th June 1900 in Limerick, Ireland. He landed at Liverpool in 1920 to escape what was becoming a rather ‘confused’ political situation in Ireland. He worked then in the construction industry until the mid 1920’s when there was a recession, when he took a job working on a farm in Sheffield. When the recession ended he started working for a civil engineering company in Sheffield and was sent to Paignton to work on the gasometer site which was being built on the seafront between Torquay and Paignton. He then moved on to Staverton Leat where they camped in the fields. There used to be regular winter floods which came up and washed the camp away together with the wooden casting forms for the concrete. They had to go to Totnes to recover them from the river. According to my mother, there were a couple of brothers called McCarthy in the construction gang who were constant trouble makers and tried to discredit my father to her. One day when she walked out of the house my father had one of the McCarthys by the neck and was holding him over the leat bridge.
My gran was Mrs Napper, who the train crossing is named after. It was her job to open and close the level crossing gates. When the area was flooded she had to use two chairs to get across and back from the gates. The bottom half of the house had been abandoned many years before she moved there because of the constant flooding. My mother used to catch eels in the leat using a nylon stocking with some chicken offal inside. My mother (Ethel Napper) married my father (John O’Connell) on the 19th June 1937 at Totnes Catholic church. After they married they lived at number 7 Broompark where he worked as a carpenter for Dartington Hall. In 1949 they left Broompark and bought a small farm near Aveton Gifford.
Pictured: Photo 1: John and Ethel O’Connell, 1937. Photo 2: Ethel Napper on a horse at the railway crossing, 1933.
Thank you, to both the Amhersts and Richard O’Connell for providing their time and fascinating accounts.
Frack Free Totnes, a new activist group, holds awareness-raising stalls on Fridays and Saturdays 11.30-1.30pm on Totnes High St/Market square.
A meeting this Sunday 15th Jan. at 7pm, Seven Stars Hotel, TQ9 5DD will focus on actions and strategies we can take here in Totnes, for example, switch to a green energy provider, switch banks, write letters, create street theatre and street choir songs, join solidarity trips to direct action camps or support divestment initiatives. There will be a public Film Show on Sunday 29th Jan. For more information, contact Peter Burgess on 01803 862980 or 07747038371. Here’s their Facebook page.
Help protect the places and life you love from climate change.
In February 2017, people across the country will make, wear and share green hearts to Show The Love for the places, people and life we want to protect from climate change.
Together, we want a world powered by clean and secure energy within a generation.
For The Love Of… is a campaign by The Climate Coalition for action on climate change to protect the things we all love, from bees to the British coastline to people everywhere.
Download your tool-kit here, or ask Tresoc and Totnes WI about how you can be involved.
Community Energy retains overwhelming backing of UK public and increased support among Conservative voters, survey finds.
An overwhelming majority of the public would support local renewable energy projects, including wind turbines, if they were owned and controlled by the community, according to new research from Co-operative Energy. This includes not just Labour, Liberal Democrat and Green Party supporters, but also those who identify with the Conservative Party.
More than two-thirds (67 per cent) of the 2,000 UK adults polled said they would support local community-owned renewable energy projects such as wind turbines, with just 8% in opposition. Support among Conservative voters increased from 62% in 2015 to 65% in 2016.
A staggering 78 per cent of the public thought that the Government should do more ‘to help local communities generate their own energy, with profits staying in the area’. Just 6 percent opposed this. Again, support among Conservative voters increased, from 73% in 2015 to 76% in 2016.
The findings directly challenge the Government’s recent decisions to slash subsidies for small, local renewable energy schemes and to bar investors from access to social investment tax relief. Two-thirds (68%) of respondents say that they are prepared to pay a small surcharge each year on their energy bill to fund an expansion of community energy, with just 15% opposing this. While 58% believe that the Government should change its mind and once again offer tax relief to those individuals who take the risk of investing in community energy, with just 12% against. Backing for these measures was higher still among Conservative supporters.
Read the article.
The outcome of COP21 is something to celebrate: net-zero human emissions – a balancing of what we release into the air and what is taken out – and when the dust settles and the Paris Agreement is in the hands of lawmakers, clean energy will be the best, cheapest, and most effective way to keep their promise. What else?
- At least $100 billion in finance after 2020 to keep the money for poor countries flowing for decades;
- A promise to meet every five years to increase ambition and move us closer and closer to the day the net-zero world becomes reality; and
- A global agreement that climate change is a world problem, requiring cooperation from Saudi Arabia to Spain to Senegal to deliver a future for this human family.
Most importantly, the mobilization in the face of climate change sends a clear message to investors everywhere: sinking money into fossil fuels is a dead bet. Renewables are the profit centre. Technology to bring us to 100% clean energy is the money-maker of the future.